Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023

 For the transition period from  ______to  _____

Commission File Number: 001-31588

PINEAPPLE ENERGY INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

10900 Red Circle Drive, Minnetonka, MN 55343

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (952) 996-1674

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

YES  ¨  NO  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.  YES  ¨  NO  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES  x  NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  YES  x  NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “ large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer  ¨  Accelerated Filer  ¨  Non-Accelerated Filer  x

Smaller Reporting Company  x  Emerging Growth Company  ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.   ¨  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.   ¨ 

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  YES  ¨  NO  x 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $9,937,000 based upon the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on June 30, 2023.

As of March 15, 2024 there were outstanding 64,077,119 shares of the Registrant’s common stock.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, if filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2023, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K, or such Part III information will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A within 120 days after December 31, 2023.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

‎

RISK FACTOR SUMMARY

Below is a summary of the material risks to our business, operations and the investment in our common stock. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, and other risks that we face, can be found below under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and should be carefully considered, together with other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in its entirety before making investment decisions regarding our common stock.

Risks Related to the Company’s Common Stock

Our failure to maintain compliance with the Nasdaq Stock Market’s continued listing requirements could result in the delisting of our common stock, which could negatively affect the market price of our common stock, our liquidity and our ability to raise capital.

Future sales of Company shares could cause the Company’s stock price to decline.

Our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2023 due to material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to remediate these material weaknesses and maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and materially and adversely affect our business and financial results.

The price of the Company’s common stock may be volatile and may decline in value.

The Company may issue additional common stock resulting in stock ownership dilution.

Anti-takeover provisions in the Company’s organizational documents and agreements may discourage or prevent a change in control, even if a sale of the Company could be beneficial to the Company’s shareholders, which could cause its stock price to decline and prevent attempts by the Company’s shareholders to replace or remove its current management.

The Company’s board of directors is authorized to issue and designate shares of preferred stock without shareholder approval.

Risks Relating to the Company’s Business

The Company’s growth strategy depends on the continued origination of solar installation agreements.

If the Company fails to manage its operations and growth effectively, it may be unable to execute its business plan, maintain high levels of customer service or adequately address competitive challenges.

The Company needs to raise additional capital to fund its operations and repay its obligations, which funding may not be available on favorable terms or at all and may lead to substantial dilution to the Company’s existing shareholders. Further, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, which conditions may adversely affect the Company’s stock price and its ability to raise capital.

The Company depends on a limited number of suppliers of solar energy system components and technologies to adequately meet demand for its solar energy systems.

Increases in the cost of the Company’s solar energy systems due to tariffs and other trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. government could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s operating results and its ability to grow may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year, which could make its future performance difficult to predict and could cause its operating results for a particular period to fall below expectations.

We may not realize the anticipated benefits of past or future investments, strategic transactions, or acquisitions, and integration of these acquisitions may disrupt our business and our management.

If the Company is unable to make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, its future growth would be limited, and any acquisitions it may make could reduce, rather than increase, its cash flows.

Product liability and property damage claims against the Company or accidents could result in adverse publicity and potentially significant monetary damages.

The Company will not be able to insure against all potential risks and it may become subject to higher insurance premiums.

Damage to the Company’s brand and reputation or change or loss of use of its brand could harm its business and results of operations.

The loss of one or more members of the Company’s senior management or key employees may adversely affect its ability to implement its strategy.

The Company’s inability to protect its intellectual property could adversely affect its business. The Company may also be subject to intellectual property rights claims by third parties, which are extremely costly to defend, could require it to pay significant damages and could limit its ability to use certain technologies.

The Company may be subject to interruptions or failures in its information technology systems.

The Company’s information technology systems may be exposed to various cybersecurity risks and other disruptions that could impair its ability to operate, adversely affect its business, and damage its brand and reputation.

A failure to hire and retain a sufficient number of key employees, such as installers and electricians, would constrain our growth and our ability to timely complete projects.

Our business is concentrated in certain markets, putting us at risk of region-specific disruptions.

Risks Related to the Solar Industry

If sufficient additional demand for residential solar energy systems does not develop or takes longer to develop than the Company anticipates, its ability to originate solar installation agreements may decrease.

The Company’s business prospects are dependent in part on a continuing decline in the cost of solar energy system components and the Company’s business may be adversely affected to the extent the cost of these components stabilize or increase in the future.

The Company faces competition from centralized electric utilities, retail electric providers, independent power producers and renewable energy companies.

Developments in technology or improvements in distributed solar energy generation and related technologies or components may have a materially adverse effect on demand for the Company’s offerings.

A material reduction in the retail price of electricity charged by electric utilities or other retail electricity providers could harm the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Terrorist or cyberattacks against centralized utilities could adversely affect the Company’s business.

Climate change may have long-term impacts on the Company’s business, industry, and the global economy.

Risks Related to Regulations

Increases in the cost of the Company’s solar energy systems due to tariffs imposed by the U.S. government could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is not currently regulated as an electric public utility under applicable law, but may be subject to regulation as an electric utility in the future.

Electric utility policies and regulations, including those affecting electric rates, may present regulatory and economic barriers to the purchase and use of solar energy systems that may significantly reduce demand for the Company’s solar energy systems and adversely impact its ability to originate new solar installation agreements.

The Company relies on net metering and related policies to sell solar systems to its customers in most of its current markets, and changes to policies governing net metering may significantly reduce demand for electricity from residential solar energy systems and thus for the Company’s installation services.

A customer’s decision to procure installation services from the Company depends in part on the availability of rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives. The expiration, elimination or reduction of these rebates, credits or incentives or its ability to monetize them could adversely impact its business.

Technical and regulatory limitations regarding the interconnection of solar energy systems to the electrical grid may significantly delay interconnections and customer in-service dates, harming the Company’s growth rate and customer satisfaction.

Compliance with occupational safety and health requirements and best practices can be costly, and noncompliance with such requirements may result in potentially significant monetary penalties, operational delays and adverse publicity.

Our business is subject to consumer protection laws. Such laws and regulatory enforcement policies and priorities are subject to change, which may negatively impact our business.

‎

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

OVERVIEW

Pineapple Energy Inc.’s (herein referred to as “Pineapple,” “PEGY,” “our,” “we” or the “Company”) vision is to power the energy transition through grass-roots growth of solar electricity paired with battery storage. The Company is a growing domestic operator and consolidator of residential and commercial solar, battery storage, and grid services solutions. Our strategy is focused on acquiring, integrating, and growing leading local and regional solar, storage, and energy services companies nationwide.  

Pineapple is primarily engaged in the sale, design, and installation of photovoltaic solar energy systems and battery storage systems through its Hawaii-based Hawaii Energy Connection (“HEC”) and New York-based SUNation Solar Systems (“SUNation”) entities. We install systems that provide clean, reliable solar energy typically at savings relative to traditional utility offerings. Our primary customers are residential homeowners. We also provide solar energy systems to commercial owners and other municipal customers.  

Through its E-Gear, LLC (“E-Gear”) business, Pineapple also develops, manufactures, and sells patented edge-of-grid energy management software and hardware technology, such as energy management control devices. These products allow homeowners to get the most out of their installed photovoltaic solar energy systems and utility grid support benefits. Our primary customers for this technology are energy services companies and other utilities.  

Corporate History 

Pineapple is a Minnesota corporation organized in 1969 that operates directly and through its subsidiaries located in the United States (“U.S.”).

On March 28, 2022, the Company completed its previously announced merger transaction with Pineapple Energy LLC (“Pineapple Energy”) in accordance with the terms of that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger dated March 1, 2021, as amended by an Amendment No. 1 to Merger Agreement dated December 16, 2021 (collectively the “merger agreement”), by and among the Company, Helios Merger Co., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger Sub”), Pineapple Energy LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Lake Street Solar LLC as the Members’ Representative, and Randall D. Sampson as the Shareholders’ Representative, pursuant to which Merger Sub merged with and into Pineapple Energy, with Pineapple Energy surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “merger”). Following the closing of the merger (the “Closing”) the Company changed its name from Communications Systems, Inc. to Pineapple Holdings, Inc. and commenced doing business using the Pineapple name, and subsequently, on April 13, 2022, changed its name to Pineapple Energy Inc.

In addition, on March 28, 2022 and immediately prior to the closing of the merger, Pineapple Energy completed its acquisition (“HEC Asset Acquisition”) of substantially all of the assets of two Hawaii-based solar energy companies, HEC and E-Gear. On November 9, 2022, the Company purchased the equity of New York-based SUNation Solar Systems, Inc. and five of its affiliated entities (collectively “SUNation”).

Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Company sold substantially all of its JDL Technologies, Inc. (“JDL”) and Ecessa Corporation (“Ecessa”) businesses on June 30, 2023. Because the Company was working to divest such assets pursuant to the merger agreement, it previously met the criteria to report the operations of these businesses as discontinued operations. See Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Discontinued Operations.” As a result, unless otherwise noted, all information in this Form 10-K related to the JDL and Ecessa businesses is discussed and presented as discontinued operations and the Company’s remaining business operations are reported as continuing operations.

Our Strategy

Our strategy is designed to provide customers with sustainable energy security by leveraging our people, technology, and processes to deliver solutions that improve the performance, increase the reliability, and reduce the cost of energy. Key elements of our strategy include:

Capitalizing on the opportunity for industry and regional consolidation. Residential solar is a fragmented industry, with over 4,000 contractors nationwide. We believe the Sunrun-Vivint merger in 2020 started an era of consolidation and the positive impact of scale-expansion. According to Wood Mackenzie, as of 2022 Q2, 70%+ of the residential solar market is served by a regional or local installer. We believe there is a tremendous opportunity for a consolidator to rapidly scale its business and become one of the most recognized brands in the industry through acquiring, integrating, and growing leading local and regional solar sales and installation companies.

Leverage and continue to lower our customer acquisition costs through referral programs. We already have what we believe are premier referral rates, with over 50% of installed jobs in 2022 and 2023 coming from referrals or repeat customers. We believe that our existing HEC and SUNation portfolio companies form a foundation to drive improved referral performance across the network of companies we acquire, further increasing our referral rates and lowering our overall customer acquisition cost.

Continue to grow our operations to achieve economies of scale. Residential solar is like many industries in that cost-of-goods-sold is a significant expense, and companies with greater scale can enjoy significantly lower costs throughout their equipment supply chain. As we grow both organically and through acquisitions, we expect to lower the costs of acquiring key input products such as modules, inverters, and electrical balance-of-systems components, which we anticipate should allow us to accelerate growth through lower pricing and enhanced profit margins. With scalable shared services (e.g., accounting, HR, policy, marketing, legal, IT), we believe our current approach of organic growth enhanced by acquisitions will lead to profitability and cash generation. We are also able to help our customers access various options to finance their acquisition of a solar system through referrals to a variety of solar finance companies.

Explore potential opportunities outside of solar to become a one-stop shop for consumers’ home and energy needs. As we continue to grow our customer base, we may have new opportunities for incremental revenue by cross-selling ancillary market products such as more energy storage, smart appliance, energy management software, comfort and lighting and security markets.

We believe that the following key strengths of our business position us to execute on our M&A roll-up strategy and to distinguish us from competitors.

Customer centric approach in market, leading to competitive customer acquisition costs. Pineapple seeks to put the customer above all else. Our installers complete offerings in-house as full-service installers to have total control of the customer experience. Pineapple offers transparent, clear sales agreements and has invested in digital tools to support customers along the installation journey. Our installers are active in their local communities to build a trusted brand. These activities lead to satisfied customers, as demonstrated by a high average referral rate and favorable online reviews, helping to lower future customer acquisition costs.

A leading vendor for cutting-edge product offerings. We are a leading vendor for cutting-edge product offerings from Enphase, Tesla, FranklinWH, and other large solar product providers. As an experienced operator in the residential solar industry, we have built relationships with these large solar product providers.

Seasoned and experienced management team. We have a strong leadership team, with deep experience in residential solar and M&A. Our founder and chief executive officer previously led various marketing, digital, product, and customer experience functions at the two largest U.S. residential solar companies. Our senior executive in charge of products and technology has more than a decade of experience in residential solar development, manufacturing, and sales. Our chief financial officer has previously scaled a business unit of a public company and was a key M&A finance leader.

Our Products and Services

The primary product we offer to customers is a photovoltaic solar energy system, which is almost always installed on the roof, although can at times be ground mounted. Solar panels, also called modules, generate direct-current electricity when they are struck by sunlight. This direct current (“DC”) is sent to an inverter, which converts the DC electricity into alternating-current (“AC”) electricity, which is the type of electricity that is needed to provide power to outlets and run home appliances and equipment The AC flows from the inverter to the home’s main electrical panel, where it is then used to supply the home’s current power needs. If there is a shortfall, the home draws the remainder needed from the traditional utility connection, often referred to as the “grid.” If the home system has excess production, the surplus is usually exported back to the grid. Residential solar systems typically provide cost savings to customers because the system’s roof-panels generate power from the sun instead of customer’s needing to purchase power from the utility. In addition, customers generally receive tax incentives and credits for the excess generation provided back to the utility.

Battery storage is an increasingly important piece of our offering. Lithium-ion batteries store excess solar generated electricity on the residential premises, as opposed to sending it back to the grid. This can generate economic benefits in markets with utility time-of-use (“TOU”) rates, whereby a homeowner is compensated at a low rate during the day for sending solar to the grid but would be charged a high rate in the evening for drawing electricity from the grid. In TOU markets, customers can store their excess power during the day and then utilize the stored power at night, thus saving money. An equally important benefit of pairing a battery with solar is that a battery will keep powering a customer’s home during a grid outage. A solar system alone will not continue providing a home with electricity if the grid is down as the utility company establishes automatic disconnects to ensure that no live current is sent back into the grid for safety reasons. When a battery is added, the system can automatically and nearly-instantaneously become a self-contained micro-grid during an outage. The home can continue utilizing the electricity generated by the panels, as well as electricity stored in the battery when the sun is not shining. In addition, the excess production from the panels during the day can be used to recharge a battery that was depleted overnight.

In the Hawaiian market we also offer energy management control devices on solar systems that are paired with batteries. This is an emerging part of the business, but soon we believe we will be able to help homeowners generate ongoing revenue streams by

aggregating their batteries into a fleet, thus creating a “virtual power plant” and selling grid services to the utility. We have proprietary technology in this area, strong relationships with regulators and utilities.

Residential Customers Agreements

The majority of Pineapple revenue (81% of 2023 consolidated revenue) comes from photovoltaic solar energy systems and batteries for residential homeowners. The size of our residential installations vary by location. In 2023, the average system size was 6.2 kilowatts for HEC customers in Hawaii and 11.5 kilowatts for SUNation customers in Long Island, New York.

Historically, most residential homeowners have chosen to own their home system rather than pursue a third-party ownership model. Pineapple believes that it has historically been best for customers to own their own systems, but recognizes that some customers do not want to own their systems.

For customers pursuing the home ownership model, these customers typically pursue loan financing, although a small proportion pay in cash. Pineapple assists customers in obtaining loan financing options through our relationships with diverse funding sources. Under these loan financing agreements, there is typically no down-payment or upfront cost to the homeowner. A “dealer fee” is typically rolled into the principal balance, and that amount is amortized over the tenure of the loan. Customers will pay for this amount financed plus a finance charge through a monthly payment to a financing supplier.

Under the customer loan scenario, Pineapple receives cash payments from the loan company upon completion of various milestones during the installation process.

Competition

In the solar installation market, we compete with companies that offer products like ours. Some of these companies have greater financial resources, operational experience, and technical capabilities than we do. When bidding for solar installation projects, however, our current experience suggests that there is no clear dominant or preferred competitor in the markets in which we compete. We do not believe that any competitor has more than 25% of market share in the regions in which we operate. We compete with other solar installers on pricing, service, warranty, and the ability to arrange financing. We also compete, on a cost basis, with traditional utilities that supply electricity to our potential customers and with companies that are not regulated like traditional utilities but that have access to the traditional utility electricity transmission and distribution infrastructure pursuant to state and local pro-competitive and consumer choice policies. Our advantage over traditional utilities is that we offer customers the opportunity to create their own electricity and reduce dependency on the traditional electrical grid. We compete with these traditional utilities primarily based on price (cents per kilowatt hour), predictability of future prices, the backup power capabilities of our battery storage solution and the ease by which customers can switch to electricity generated by our solar energy systems.

We believe we are a strong competitor, but the marketplace is comprised of many companies. There are over 4,000 residential solar sales and installation companies in the U.S., and most residential solar sales are competitive with customers receiving quotes from multiple companies.

We also compete with (i) companies that are not regulated like traditional utilities but that have access to the traditional utility electricity transmission and distribution infrastructure pursuant to state and local pro-competitive and consumer choice policies and (ii) solar companies with business models that are like ours. Some customers might choose to subscribe to a community solar project or renewable subscriber program with these companies or their utilities, instead of installing a solar energy system on their home, which could affect our sales. Additionally, some utilities offer generation portfolios that are increasingly renewable in nature. We believe that we compete favorably with these companies based on our unique multi-channel approach and differentiated customer experience.

We also face competition from: purely sales organizations that acquire customers and then subcontract out the installation of solar energy systems; from those installation businesses that seek financing from external parties; from large construction companies and utilities; and from sophisticated electrical and roofing companies.

Intellectual Property

We hold registered trademarks for, among others, “Pineapple Energy Inc,” “Hawaii Energy Connection,” “SUNation Solar Systems, Inc.,” “Sungevity,” and “Horizon Solar Power.” These trademarks are important to our regional branding and growth strategy.

We hold patents related to E-Gear technologies. While these patents are an important part of our intellectual property, we do not consider any to be material to our business.

Government Regulation

We are not regulated as a public utility in the U.S. under applicable national, state, or other local regulatory regimes where we conduct business.

To install systems, we obtain interconnection permission from the applicable local primary electric utility. Depending on the size of the solar energy system and local law requirements, interconnection permission is provided by the local utility directly to us and/or our customers. In almost all cases, interconnection permissions are issued based on a standard process that has been pre-approved by the local public utility commission or other regulatory body with jurisdiction over net metering policies. As such, no additional regulatory approvals are required once interconnection permission is given.

Our operations are subject to stringent and complex federal, state, and local laws, including regulations governing the occupational health and safety of our employees and wage regulations. For example, we are subject to the requirements of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, as amended (“OSHA”), the U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”), and comparable state laws that protect and regulate employee health and safety. We endeavor to maintain compliance with applicable DOT, OSHA, and other comparable government regulations.

Government Incentives

Federal, state, and local government bodies provide incentives, including rebates, tax credits, and other financial incentives, to catalyze customer acceptance of solar energy as an alternative to utility-provided power.

Some of the most significant federal incentives are expected to come from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”). In August 2022, President Biden signed the IRA. Among other provisions, the IRA extended the Investment Tax Credit (“ITC”) for homeowners. Qualifying homeowners who purchase a residential solar energy system and/or energy storage system can receive a 30% tax credit, returning a material portion of purchase price to homeowners. This 30% tax credit lasts until 2033 before stepping down to 26% in 2033, 22% in 2034, and 0% in 2035, unless extended again by Congress. Since its inception in 2005, the ITC has already been extended three times.

At the state and local level, one of the key polices in place in many states that have enabled the growth of distributed solar is net metering. Net metering provides significant value to certain customers with solar energy systems for the electricity generated by their systems but not directly consumed on site. Net metering allows a customer to pay the local electric utility only for power usage net of excess production from the customer's solar energy system. Customers receive a credit for the energy an interconnected solar energy system generates in excess of that needed by the home or business, which is provided to the electrical grid.

In addition to net metering, many states have enacted programs to further compensate homeowners who generate their own clean electricity for their contributions to society via their production of carbon-free renewable electricity. The mechanisms can vary, but solar renewable energy certificates (“SREC”) or production credits are two of the more common paths.

More than half of the states, and many local jurisdictions, have established property tax incentives for renewable energy systems that include exemptions, exclusions, abatements, and credits. Approximately 30 states and the District of Columbia have adopted a renewable portfolio standard (and eight other states have some voluntary goal) that requires regulated utilities to procure a specified percentage of total electricity delivered in the state from eligible renewable energy sources, such as solar energy systems, by a specified date.

Human Capital

As of March 15, 2024, the Company employed 201 people. We consider our relations with our employees to be good. None of our employees are currently represented by a labor union.

The Company aims to attract and retain qualified personnel and provides wages and benefits that are competitive locally to reward employees for performance. The Company values innovation, inclusion and diversity, safety and engagement as they attract, develop, and retain the best talent.

The health and safety of our employees is a top priority of our leaders.  We believe the Company has generally been successful implementing proactive measures to protect the health and safety of its employees while maintaining business continuity and high levels of service to our customers.

Available Information

The Company maintains a website at www.pineappleenergy.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and other reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available

free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after these documents are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). To obtain copies of these reports, go to www.ir.pineappleenergy.com and click on “Financial Info,” then click on “Financial Results” to view all of our current EDGAR reports.

The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, like Pineapple, that file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s website is www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of and in reliance on the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements. Actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those factors discussed below.

Risks Related to the Company’s Common Stock

Our failure to maintain compliance with the Nasdaq Stock Market’s continued listing requirements could result in the delisting of our common stock, which could negatively affect the market price of our common stock, our liquidity and our ability to raise capital.

Our common stock is currently listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market. In order to maintain this listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other requirements. On October 27, 2023, we received a notice from the Listing Qualifications Department of the Nasdaq Stock Market informing us that because the closing bid price for our common stock listed on Nasdaq was below $1.00 per share for the last 31 consecutive business days, we did not comply with the minimum closing bid price requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market under Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5550(a)(2) (the "Minimum Bid Rule"). In accordance with Nasdaq’s Listing Rules, we have a period of 180 calendar days, or until April 24, 2024, to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Rule.

Additionally, on February 27, 2024, the Staff issued another notice (the “February Notice”) notifying us that our common stock had a closing bid price of $0.10 or less for 10 consecutive trading days (February 12, 2024 to February 26, 2024). Accordingly, the Company is subject to the provisions contemplated under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(iii) (the “Low Priced Stock Rule”). As a result, the Staff had determined to delist the Company’s securities from Nasdaq effective as of the opening of business on March 7, 2024, unless the Company requested an appeal before the Nasdaq Hearings Panel (the “Panel”) of the Staff’s determination by March 5, 2024. The Company requested a hearing before the Panel to appeal the February Notice, and Nasdaq has scheduled the hearing for April 30, 2024. Accordingly, the delisting action has been stayed, pending a final written decision by the Panel.

There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Rule at all or by the deadline, or that any related extension request will be granted. Further, there can be no assurances that the hearing related to the Low Priced Stock Rule will occur, that a favorable decision will be obtained if the hearing is held, that the Panel will grant any request for an extension period within which to regain compliance, or that the Company will be able meet the continued listing requirements during any compliance period or in the future. If the Company is unable to regain or maintain compliance with these Nasdaq requirements, its common stock will be delisted from Nasdaq.

While on January 3, 2024 the Company’s shareholders approved a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock at a ratio within a range of 1-for-2 to 1-for-15, as determined by our board of directors, the board has not implemented a reverse stock split pursuant to that approval, and has determined that, based on recent stock prices of the Company’s common stock, the maximum ratio under that approved range of 1-for-15 would not be sufficient to cause the stock price to increase or be maintained at a level that would satisfy the Minimum Bid Rule. As a result, the board has called a special meeting of shareholders to request, among other matters, that its shareholders approve a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock at a ratio within a range of 1-for-25 and 1-for-200, as determined by the board. However, there can be no assurance that shareholders will approve that reverse stock split or that any reverse stock split that is effected will increase, or maintain, the bid price per share of our common stock sufficiently to satisfy the Minimum Bid Rule or the Low Priced Stock Rule.

The perception among investors that we are at a heightened risk of delisting could negatively affect the market price and trading volume of our common stock. If our common stock is delisted from Nasdaq, the delisting could: substantially decrease trading in our common stock; adversely affect the market liquidity of our common stock as a result of the loss of market efficiencies associated with Nasdaq and the loss of federal preemption of state securities laws; adversely affect our ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future on acceptable terms, if at all; result in the potential loss of confidence by investors, suppliers, partners and employees and fewer business development opportunities; and result in limited analyst interest. Additionally, the market price of our common stock may decline further, and shareholders may lose some or all of their investment.

Future sales of Company shares could cause the Company’s stock price to decline.

If shareholders of the Company, sell, or indicate an intention to sell, substantial amounts of the Company’s common stock in the public market, the trading price of the common stock of the Company could decline. Upon conversion of the Convertible Preferred Stock and exercise of the common stock PIPE Warrants or the issuance of the earnout consideration from the merger, the number of shares outstanding of the Company’s common stock could increase substantially. Dilution and potential dilution, the availability of a large number of shares for sale, and the possibility of additional issuances and sales of the Company’s common stock may negatively affect both the trading price and liquidity of the Company’s common stock.

Our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2023 due to material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to remediate these material weaknesses and maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and materially and adversely affect our business and financial results.

The process of designing and implementing and maintaining effective internal controls for newly acquired businesses has required and is expected to continue to require significant resources of the Company. We have concluded that we have material weaknesses in our internal controls due to our limited accounting and finance resources which resulted in inappropriate preparation, review and maintenance of documentation critical to the design and consistent execution of internal controls. Due to limited staffing,it can be challenging to properly prepare, review and maintain appropriate documentation critical to the process.

The process of designing and implementing and maintaining effective internal controls for newly acquired businesses has required and is expected to continue to require significant resources of the Company. We have concluded that we have material weaknesses in our internal controls due to our limited accounting and finance resources which resulted in inappropriate preparation, review and maintenance of documentation critical to the design and consistent execution of internal controls. Due to limited staffing, it can be challenging to properly prepare, review and maintain appropriate documentation critical to the process. If the Company continues to have material weaknesses in our internal controls or is unable to establish or maintain appropriate internal financial controls and procedures, it could cause the Company to fail to meet its reporting obligations on a timely basis, result in material misstatements in its consolidated financial statements, and harm its operating results. In addition, the process for designing and implementing and maintaining an effective internal control environment for the Company may divert management’s attention from revenue generating or other important business activities.

If the Company fails to design and implement and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting for newly acquired businesses in the required timeframe, it may be subject to sanctions or investigations by regulatory authorities, including the SEC and Nasdaq. Furthermore, if the Company is unable to conclude that its internal controls over financial reporting are effective, it could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of its financial reports, the market price of the Company’s securities could decline, and it could be subject to sanctions or investigations by regulatory authorities. Failure to implement or maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures required of public companies could also restrict the Company’s future access to the capital markets.

The price of the Company’s common stock may be volatile and may decline in value.

The market price for the Company’s common stock has been highly volatile, and the market from time to time has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of public companies. The trading volume and prices of the common stock have been volatile and may continue to be volatile and could fluctuate widely due to factors both within and beyond the Company’s control. During 2024 through March 15, 2024, the sale price of common stock ranged from $0.05 to $0.63 per share, and our daily trading volume ranged from 8,000 to approximately 49.5 million shares. This volatility may, in part, be the result of broad market and industry factors. Future fluctuations in the trading price or liquidity of the Company’s common stock may harm the value of the investment of the Company’s shareholders in the Company’s common stock.

Factors that may have a significant impact on the market price and marketability of the Company’s common stock include, among others:

public reaction to the Company’s press releases, announcements and filings with the SEC;

the Company’s operating and financial performance;

fluctuations in broader securities market prices and volumes, particularly among securities of technology and solar companies;

changes in market valuations of similar companies;

departures of key personnel;

commencement of or involvement in litigation;

variations in the Company’s quarterly results of operations or those of other technology and solar companies;

changes in general economic conditions, financial markets or the technology and solar industries;

announcements by the Company or its competitors of significant acquisitions or other transactions;

changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;

speculation in the press or investment community;

actions by the Company’s shareholders, particularly relating to the Company’s common stock;

the failure of securities analysts to cover the Company’s common stock or changes in their recommendations and estimates of its financial performance;

future sales of the Company’s common stock;

the delisting of the Company’s common stock or halting or suspension of trading in its common stock by the Nasdaq Stock Market; 

economic and other external factors, such as the COVID-19 pandemic; and

general market conditions.

The Company may issue additional common stock resulting in stock ownership dilution.

As of March 15, 2024, we had 64,927,119 shares of common stock outstanding. There are an additional 911,404 shares reserved for issuance upon the settlement of outstanding restricted stock units, 271,090 shares available for grant under the 2022 Equity Incentive Plan, and 415,005 shares available for issuance under the 2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Accordingly, our shareholders may experience future dilution, which may be substantial.

Additionally, in the PIPE offering, we issued shares of our Convertible Preferred Stock that were initially convertible into 2,352,936 shares of our common stock and we issued PIPE Warrants that were initially exercisable for 2,352,936 shares of our common stock, each case at an initial price of $13.60 per share, which is subject to adjustment. After the November 9, 2022 and February 5, 2024 PIPE resets and subsequent conversions through March 15, 2024, the 20,597.14 of remaining preferred shares with a stated amount of $0.14 were convertible into 147,122,398 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.14, and there were outstanding warrants to purchase 235,539,698 shares of common stock with a weighted average of $0.14 per share exercise price. If the Convertible Preferred Stock or PIPE Warrants are further converted or exercised into shares of our common stock, our shareholders will experience additional dilution.

The Convertible Preferred Stock contains anti-dilution provisions that provide for a significant reset of the conversion price in connection with multiple events, including if we issue securities at a price below the current conversion price. The PIPE Warrants contain anti-dilution provisions that provide for a significant reset of the exercise price in connection with multiple events, including if we issue securities at a price below the current exercise price, and in such instance the number of shares of common stock increases. At our stock price as of March 15, 2024, if we were to trigger these anti-dilution provisions, including through the sale of securities for purposes of a capital raising transaction, a substantial number of additional shares of our common stock may become issuable, which would further materially dilute the ownership interests of our shareholders. For illustrative purposes only, if we were to sell shares of common stock that reset the conversion price of the Convertible Preferred Stock to $0.07, the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market as of March 15, 2024, the Convertible Preferred Stock would be convertible into an additional 147,122,401 shares of common stock and the exercise price of the PIPE Warrants would reduce to $0.07 and the PIPE Warrants would become exercisable for an additional 221,603,161 shares of common stock.

In addition, we may raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, which would further dilute the ownership interests of our shareholders.

Anti-takeover provisions in the Company’s organizational documents and agreements may discourage or prevent a change in control, even if a sale of the Company could be beneficial to the Company’s shareholders, which could cause its stock price to decline and prevent attempts by the Company’s shareholders to replace or remove its current management.

Several provisions of the Company’s governing documents, in addition to provisions of Minnesota law, could make it difficult for the Company’s shareholders to change the composition of the Company’s board of directors following the merger, preventing them from changing the composition of management. In addition, several provisions of our articles and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that our shareholders may consider favorable. These provisions include:

Shares of common stock and preferred stock are available for issuance without shareholder approval. The existence of unissued and unreserved common stock and preferred stock may enable the board of directors to issue shares to persons friendly to current management or to issue preferred stock with terms that could render more difficult or discourage a third-party attempt to obtain control of the Company by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, thereby protecting the continuity of its management.

Shares of the Company’s common stock do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors, so our shareholders holding a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding are able to elect all of the Company’s directors.

Special meetings of the shareholders may be called only by the board of directors, the chairman of the board of directors or the chief executive officer.

The board of directors may adopt, alter, amend or repeal some provisions of the bylaws of the Company without shareholder approval.

Unless otherwise provided by law, any newly created directorship or any vacancy occurring on the board of directors for any cause may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining members of the board of directors even if such majority is less than a quorum, and any director so elected shall hold office until the expiration of the term of office of the director whom he or she has replaced or until his or her successor is elected and qualified. 

The affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of the Company’s capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, is required to amend or repeal certain provisions of our articles and bylaws relating to advance notice of nominations for election and advance notice of shareholder proposals.

Shareholders must follow advance notice procedures to submit nominations of candidates for election to the Board of Directors at an annual or special meeting of our shareholders and must follow advance notice procedures to submit other proposals for business to be brought before an annual meeting of our shareholders.

These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability of our shareholders to benefit from a change in control and, as a result, could materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock and the ability of our shareholders to realize any potential change-in-control premium.

The Company’s board of directors is authorized to issue and designate shares of preferred stock without shareholder approval.

The Company’s articles of incorporation authorize the board of directors, without the approval of the Company shareholders, to issue up to 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock, subject to limitations prescribed by applicable law, rules and regulations and the provisions of the articles of incorporation, as shares of preferred stock in series, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. The powers, preferences and rights of these series of preferred stock may be senior to or on parity with our common stock, which may reduce its value.

Risks Relating to the Company’s Business

The Company’s growth strategy depends on the continued origination of solar installation agreements.

The Company’s growth strategy depends on the continued origination of solar installation agreements. The Company may be unable to originate additional solar installation agreements and related solar energy systems in the numbers or at the pace the Company currently expects for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to, the following:

demand for solar energy systems failing to develop sufficiently or taking longer than expected to develop;

residential solar energy technology being unavailable at economically attractive prices as a result of factors outside of the Company’s control, including utility prices not rising as quickly as anticipated;

issues related to financing, construction, permitting, the environment, governmental approvals and the negotiation of solar installation agreements;

a reduction in government incentives or adverse changes in policy and laws for the development or use of solar energy, including net metering, SRECs and tax credits;

other government or regulatory actions that could adversely affect the Company’s business model;

supply chain issues considering most residential solar panels are manufactured outside the U.S.;

negative developments in public perception of the solar energy industry; and

competition from other solar companies following a business plan similar to the Company’s and other energy technologies, including the emergence of alternative renewable energy technologies.
‎

If the challenges of originating solar installation agreements increase, the Company’s pool of available opportunities may be limited, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

If the Company fails to manage its operations and growth effectively, it may be unable to execute its business plan, maintain high levels of customer service or adequately address competitive challenges.

The Company continues to be focused on growing revenue in the future and it intends to continue its efforts to expand its business within existing and new markets. This growth may place a strain on the Company’s management, operational and financial infrastructure. The Company’s growth requires management to devote a significant amount of time and effort to maintain and expand

its relationships with customers and third parties, attract new customers, arrange financing for its growth and manage its expansion into additional markets.

In addition, the Company’s current and planned operations, personnel, information technology and other systems and procedures might be inadequate to support future growth and may require it to make additional unanticipated investments in its infrastructure. The Company’s success and ability to further scale its business will depend, in part, on its ability to manage these changes in a cost-effective and efficient manner.

If the Company cannot manage its operations and growth, it may be unable to meet its or others’ expectations regarding growth, opportunity and financial targets, take advantage of market opportunities, execute its business strategies or respond to competitive pressures. This could also result in declines in quality or customer satisfaction, increased costs, difficulties in introducing new offerings or other operational difficulties. Any failure to effectively manage the Company’s operations and growth could adversely impact its reputation, business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

The Company needs to raise additional capital to fund its operations and repay its obligations, which funding may not be available on favorable terms or at all and may lead to substantial dilution to the Company’s existing shareholders. Further, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, which conditions may adversely affect the Company’s stock price and its ability to raise capital.

Based on the Company’s current financial position, including the approximately $1.8 million of cash, restricted cash, cash equivalents and investments that are restricted under the Company’s contingent value rights (“CVR”) agreement and cannot be used by the Company for its own working capital needs, the Company’s forecasted future cash flows for twelve months beyond the date of issuance of the financial statements in this report indicate that the Company will not have sufficient cash to make the first earnout payment in the second quarter of 2024 under the SUNation Transaction Agreement or the first principal payment of the long-term note that is due on November 9, 2024. As a result, the Company requires additional funding and seeks to raise capital through sources that may include public or private equity offerings, debt financings and/or strategic alliances. However, additional funding may not be available on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all. If the Company is unable to raise additional funds, it would have a negative impact on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Raising additional capital may be costly or difficult to obtain and could significantly dilute the Company’s shareholders’ ownership interests or inhibit the Company’s ability to achieve its business objectives. If the Company raises additional funds through public or private equity offerings or convertible debt or other exchangeable securities, the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of the Company’s common shareholders. To the extent that the Company raises additional capital through the sale of common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into common stock, the Company’s existing shareholders will be diluted. In addition, any debt financing may subject the Company to fixed payment obligations and covenants limiting or restricting its ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt or making capital expenditures. Further, certain transactions could trigger a reset of the exercise price of the Company’s outstanding Series A preferred stock (the “Convertible Preferred Stock”) and outstanding warrants (the “PIPE Warrants”) issued to investors in the March 28, 2022 private investment in public equity (“PIPE”) offering, which would lead to a corresponding increase in the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the PIPE Warrants, further diluting the Company’s shareholders.

On February 5, 2024, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional investors (the “Purchasers”) for the sale by the Company of 2,702,703 shares of the Company’s common stock in a registered direct offering (the “Offering”). The Purchasers in this offering agreed to purchase, and the Company has agreed to sell, the Shares at a purchase price per share of $0.37 per share. The aggregate gross proceeds for the sale of the Shares were approximately $1.0 million, before deducting the placement agent fees and related offering expenses. Following the Offering, the share price of the Company’s stock price fell due to the dilutive effects of the newly issued shares. If the Company was to undertake another similar offering, its share price could be reduced further.

In addition, the fact that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and that the Company is operating under these conditions may adversely affect the Company’s stock price and its ability to raise capital.

The Company depends on a limited number of suppliers of solar energy system components and technologies to adequately meet demand for its solar energy systems.

The Company purchases solar panels, inverters, energy storage systems and other system components and instruments from a limited number of suppliers, making it susceptible to quality issues, shortages and price changes. If one or more of the suppliers the Company relies upon to meet anticipated demand ceases or reduces production due to its financial condition, acquisition by a competitor or otherwise, is unable to increase production as industry demand increases or is otherwise unable to allocate sufficient production to it, it may be difficult to quickly identify alternative suppliers or to qualify alternative products on commercially reasonable terms and the Company’s ability to satisfy this demand may be adversely affected. There are a limited number of suppliers of solar energy system components, instruments and technologies. Any need to transition to a new supplier may result in additional costs and delays in

originating solar installation agreements and deploying its related solar energy systems, which in turn may result in additional costs and delays in its acquisition of such solar installation agreements and related solar energy systems. These issues could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

There have also been periods of industry-wide shortages of key components and instruments, including batteries and inverters, in times of rapid industry growth. The manufacturing infrastructure for some of these components has a long lead-time, requires significant capital investment and relies on the continued availability of key commodity materials, which could potentially result in an inability to meet demand for these components. The solar industry is currently experiencing rapid growth and, as a result, shortages of key components or instruments, including solar panels, may be more likely to occur, which in turn may result in price increases for such components. Even if industry-wide shortages do not occur, manufacturers and suppliers experiencing high demand or insufficient production capacity for key components may allocate these key components to customers other than the Company or its suppliers. The Company’s ability to originate solar installation agreements and related solar energy systems would be reduced as a result of the allocation of key components by manufacturers and suppliers.

The Company’s supply chain and operations could be subject to natural disasters and other events beyond its control, such as earthquakes, wildfires, flooding, hurricanes, tsunamis, typhoons, volcanic eruptions, droughts, tornadoes, power outages or other natural disasters, the effects of climate change and related extreme weather, public health issues and pandemics, war, terrorism, government restrictions or limitations on trade, and geo-political unrest and uncertainties.

Increases in the cost of the Company’s solar energy systems due to tariffs and other trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. government could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

The United States has often considered tariffs on industry-related goods imported from other countries. For example, on February 8, 2022, Auxin Solar, a U.S.-based solar panel manufacturer, submitted a petition to the U.S. Department of Commerce to request country-wide circumvention inquiries pursuant to Section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 concerning crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells and modules assembled in Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia using Chinese inputs. On April 1, 2022, the Department initiated the inquiries, and, after conducting an investigation, issued a preliminary decision on December 2, 2022, recommending that the Biden Administration impose tariffs on certain solar panel imports from the Southeast Asian countries.

Prior to the Department of Commerce issuing its preliminary decision, the Biden Administration issued an order in June 2022 that paused the collection of any new anti-dumping or countervailing duty of certain solar cells and modules exported from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam for two years, until June 2024. The White House initiated this “bridge” action in advance of the Department of Commerce’s preliminary decision, in effect guaranteeing no new solar tariffs for 24 months. Nonetheless, the Department’s investigation had the effect of increasing module prices and affected supply. If imposed in June 2024, the related duties could further increase module prices and affect supply, which would negatively impact our supply chain and operations.

Human rights and forced labor issues in foreign countries and the U.S. government’s response to them could also disrupt the Company’s supply chain and its operations could be adversely impacted.  For example, in response to allegations regarding forced labor in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China, the Biden Administration in 2021 passed the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. This Act has led to intensive examinations, withhold release orders, and other governmental procedures that have caused supply chain and operational delays. These and other similar trade restrictions that may be imposed in the future could cause delivery and installation delays and restrict the global supply of polysilicon and solar products.

The Company’s operating results and its ability to grow may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year, which could make its future performance difficult to predict and could cause its operating results for a particular period to fall below expectations.

The Company’s quarterly and annual operating results are difficult to predict and may fluctuate significantly in the future. In addition to the other risks described in this section, the following factors could cause the Company’s operating results to fluctuate:

expiration or initiation of any governmental rebates or incentives;

significant fluctuations in customer demand for the Company’s solar energy systems;

our ability to continue to expand the Company’s operations and the amount and timing of expenditures related to this expansion;

announcements by the Company or its competitors of significant acquisitions;

strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital-raising activities or commitments;

price of materials and supplies;

availability and cost of labor;

changes in the Company’s pricing policies or terms or those of its competitors, including centralized electric utilities;

actual or anticipated developments in the Company’s competitors’ businesses;

technology or the competitive landscape; and

natural disasters or other weather or meteorological conditions.
‎

For these or other reasons, past performance should not be relied upon as indications of the Company’s future performance.

We may not realize the anticipated benefits of past or future investments, strategic transactions, or acquisitions, and integration of these acquisitions may disrupt our business and our management. 

We have in the past and may in the future, acquire companies, projects, products, or technologies or enter into joint ventures or other strategic transactions.

We may not realize the anticipated benefits of past or future investments, strategic transactions, or acquisitions, and these transactions involve numerous risks that are not within our control. These risks include the following, among others:  
‎

Failure to satisfy the required conditions and otherwise complete a planned acquisition, joint venture or other strategic transaction on a timely basis or at all;  

Legal or regulatory proceedings, if any, relating to a planned acquisition, joint venture or other strategic transaction and the outcome of such legal proceedings;  

Difficulty in assimilating the operations, systems, and personnel of the acquired company;  

Difficulty in effectively integrating the acquired technologies or products with our current products and technologies;  

Difficulty in maintaining controls, procedures and policies during the transition and integration;  

Disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of our management and employees from other opportunities and challenges due to integration issues;  

Difficulty integrating the acquired company’s accounting, management information and other administrative systems;  

Inability to retain key technical and managerial personnel of the acquired business;  

Inability to retain key customers, vendors and other business partners of the acquired business;  

Inability to achieve the financial and strategic goals for the acquired and combined businesses;  

Incurring acquisition-related costs or amortization costs for acquired intangible assets that could impact our results of operations;  

Significant post-acquisition investments which may lower the actual benefits realized through the acquisition;  

Potential failure of the due diligence processes to identify significant issues with product quality, legal, and financial liabilities, among other things;  

Moderating and anticipating the impacts of inherent or emerging seasonality in acquired customer agreements;  

Potential inability to assert that internal controls over financial reporting are effective; and  

Potential inability to obtain, or obtain in a timely manner, approvals from governmental authorities, which could delay or prevent such acquisitions.  
‎

Our failure to address these risks, or other problems encountered in connection with our past or future investments, strategic transactions, or acquisitions, could cause us to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of these acquisitions or investments, cause us to incur unanticipated liabilities, and harm our business generally. Future acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, amortization expenses, incremental expenses or the write-off of goodwill, any of which could harm our financial condition or results of operations, and the trading price of our common stock could decline.

If the Company is unable to make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, its future growth would be limited, and any acquisitions it may make could reduce, rather than increase, its cash flows.

The consummation and timing of any future acquisitions will depend upon, among other things, whether the Company is able to:

identify attractive acquisition candidates;

negotiate economically acceptable purchase agreements;

obtain any required governmental or third-party consents;

obtain financing for these acquisitions on economically acceptable terms;

which may be more difficult at times when the capital markets are less accessible; and

outbid any competing bidders.
‎

Additionally, any acquisition involves potential risks, including, among other things:

mistaken assumptions about assets, revenues and expenses of the acquired company, including synergies and potential growth;

an inability to successfully integrate the assets or businesses the Company acquires;

coordinating geographically disparate organizations, systems and facilities;

the assumption of unknown liabilities for which the Company is not indemnified or for which its indemnity is inadequate;

mistaken assumptions about the acquired company’s suppliers or other vendors;

the diversion of management’s and employees’ attention from other business concerns;

unforeseen difficulties operating in new geographic areas and business lines;

customer or key employee losses at the acquired business; and

poor quality assets or installation.
‎

If the Company consummates future acquisitions, its capitalization, results of operations and future growth may change significantly and its shareholders may not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial and other relevant information considered in deciding to engage in these future acquisitions.

Product liability and property damage claims against the Company or accidents could result in adverse publicity and potentially significant monetary damages.

It is possible that the Company’s solar energy systems could injure its customers or other third parties or its solar energy systems could cause property damage as a result of product malfunctions, defects, improper installation, fire or other causes. Any product liability claim that the Company faces could be expensive to defend and may divert management’s attention. The successful assertion of product liability claims against the Company could result in potentially significant monetary damages, potential increases in insurance expenses, penalties or fines, subject it to adverse publicity, damage its reputation and competitive position and adversely affect sales of solar energy systems. In addition, product liability claims, injuries, defects or other problems experienced by other companies in the residential solar industry could lead to unfavorable market conditions to the industry as a whole and may have an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to expand its portfolio of solar installation agreements, thus affecting its business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company will not be able to insure against all potential risks and it may become subject to higher insurance premiums.

The Company’s insurance policies do not cover all potential losses and coverage is not always available in the insurance market on commercially reasonable terms. Furthermore, the receipt of insurance proceeds may be delayed, requiring the Company to use cash or incur financing costs in the interim. To the extent the Company experiences covered losses under its insurance policies, the limit of its coverage for potential losses may be decreased or the insurance rates it has to pay increased. Furthermore, the losses insured through commercial insurance are subject to the credit risk of those insurance companies.

The Company may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount it desires at reasonable rates. The insurance coverage the Company does obtain may contain large deductibles or fail to cover certain risks or all potential losses. In addition, the Company’s insurance policies will be subject to annual review by its insurers and may not be renewed on similar or favorable terms, including coverage, deductibles or premiums, or at all. If a significant accident or event occurs for which the Company is not fully insured or it suffers losses due to one or more of its insurance carriers defaulting on their obligations or contesting their coverage obligations, it could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Damage to the Company’s brand and reputation or change or loss of use of its brand could harm its business and results of operations.

The Company depends significantly on its reputation for excellent customer service and brand name to attract new customers and grow its business. If the Company fails to continue to deliver within the planned timelines, if its offerings do not perform as anticipated or if it damages any of its customers’ properties or delays or cancels projects, its brand and reputation could be significantly impaired. Future technological improvements may allow the Company to offer lower prices or offer new technology to new customers; however, technical limitations in its current solar energy systems may prevent it from offering such lower prices or new technology to the Company’s existing customers. The inability of the Company’s current customers to benefit from technological improvements could cause its existing customers to lower the value they perceive the Company’s existing products offer and impair its brand and reputation.

In addition, given the sheer number of interactions the Company’s personnel has with customers and potential customers, it is inevitable that some customers’ and potential customers’ interactions with it will be perceived as less than satisfactory. If the Company cannot manage its hiring and training processes to avoid or minimize these issues to the extent possible, its reputation may be harmed and its ability to attract new customers would suffer.

The loss of one or more members of the Company’s senior management or key employees may adversely affect its ability to implement its strategy.

The Company depends on its experienced management team and the loss of one or more key executives could have a negative impact on its business. The Company may be unable to replace key members of its management team and key employees if it loses their

services. Integrating new employees into the Company’s team could prove disruptive to the Company’s operations, require substantial resources and management attention and ultimately prove unsuccessful. An inability to attract and retain sufficient managerial personnel who have critical industry experience and relationships could limit or delay the Company’s strategic efforts, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s inability to protect its intellectual property could adversely affect its business. The Company may also be subject to intellectual property rights claims by third parties, which are extremely costly to defend, could require it to pay significant damages and could limit its ability to use certain technologies.

The Company’s success depends, at least in part, on its ability to protect its core technology and intellectual property. The Company relies on intellectual property laws, primarily a combination of copyright and trade secret laws in the U.S., as well as license agreements and other contractual provisions, to protect its proprietary technology and brand. The Company cannot be certain its agreements and other contractual provisions will not be breached, including a breach involving the use or disclosure of its trade secrets or know-how, or that adequate remedies will be available in the event of any breach. In addition, the Company’s trade secrets may otherwise become known or lose trade secret protection.

The Company cannot be certain its products and its business do not or will not violate the intellectual property rights of a third party. Third parties, including the Company’s competitors, may own patents or other intellectual property rights that cover aspects of the Company’s technology or business methods. These parties may claim the Company has misappropriated, misused, violated or infringed third-party intellectual property rights. Any claim that the Company has violated a third party’s intellectual property rights, whether with or without merit, could be time-consuming, expensive to settle or litigate and could divert its management’s attention and other resources, all of which could adversely affect its business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. If the Company does not successfully settle or defend an intellectual property claim, it could be liable for significant monetary damages and could be prohibited from continuing to use certain technology, business methods, content or brands. To avoid a prohibition, the Company could seek a license from third parties, which could require it to pay significant royalties, increasing its operating expenses. If a license is not available at all or not available on commercially reasonable terms, the Company may be required to develop or license a non-violating alternative, either of which could adversely affect its business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

The Company may be subject to interruptions or failures in its information technology systems.

The Company relies on information technology systems and infrastructure to support its business. Any of these systems may be susceptible to damage or interruption due to fire, floods, power loss, telecommunication failures, usage errors by employees, computer viruses, cyberattacks or other security breaches or similar events. A compromise of the Company’s information technology systems or those with which it interacts could harm its reputation and expose it to regulatory actions and claims from customers and other persons, any of which could adversely affect its business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. If the Company’s information systems are damaged, fail to work properly or otherwise become unavailable, it may incur substantial costs to repair or replace them and it may experience a loss of critical information, customer disruption and interruptions or delays in its ability to perform essential functions.

The Company’s information technology systems may be exposed to various cybersecurity risks and other disruptions that could impair its ability to operate, adversely affect its business, and damage its brand and reputation.

The Company relies extensively on its information technology systems and on third parties for services including its enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system, banking, payroll, shipping, and e-mail systems to conduct business. The Company also collects, stores and transmits sensitive data, including proprietary business information and personally identifiable information of its customers, suppliers and employees.

The Company’s information technology systems and communication systems are vulnerable to cybersecurity risks such as computer viruses, hacking, malware, denial of service attacks, cyber terrorism, circumvention of security systems, malfeasance, breaches due to employee error, natural disasters, telecommunications failure, at its facilities or at third-party locations.

Complying with the varying cybersecurity and data privacy regulatory requirements could cause the Company to incur substantial costs or require it to change its business practices in a manner adverse to its business. Any failure, or perceived failure, by the Company to comply with any regulatory requirements or international privacy or consumer protection-related laws and regulations could result in proceedings or actions against it by governmental entities or others, subject it to significant penalties and negative publicity and adversely affect us. In addition, as noted above, the Company is subject to the possibility of security breaches, which themselves may result in a violation of these laws. 

Any failure, breach or unauthorized access to the Company’s or third-party systems could result in the loss of confidential, sensitive or proprietary information, interruptions in its service or production or otherwise its ability to conduct business operations, and could result in potential reductions in revenue and profits, damage to its reputation or liability. Given that the Company receives, stores and

uses personal information of its customers, including names, addresses, e-mail addresses, credit information, credit card and financial account information and other housing and energy use information, this risk is amplified. There can be no assurance that the Company’s protective measures will prevent or timely detect security breaches that could have a significant impact on its business, reputation, operating results and financial condition.

If a cyberattack or other security incident were to allow unauthorized access to or modification of the Company’s customers’ data or its own data, whether due to a failure with its systems or related systems operated by third parties, it could suffer damage to its brand and reputation. The costs the Company would incur to address and fix these incidents would increase its expenses. These types of security incidents could also lead to lawsuits, regulatory investigations and increased legal liability, including in some cases contractual costs related to customer notification and fraud monitoring. Further, as regulatory focus on privacy and data security issues continues to increase and worldwide laws and regulations concerning the protection of information become more complex, the potential risks and costs of compliance to the Company’s business will intensify.

A failure to hire and retain a sufficient number of key employees, such as installers and electricians, would constrain our growth and our ability to timely complete projects.

To support our growth, we need to hire, train, deploy, manage, and retain a substantial number of skilled employees, including but not limited to engineers, installers, and electricians. Competition for these roles is increasing. Shortages of skilled labor could significantly delay a project or otherwise increase our costs.

Our business is concentrated in certain markets, putting us at risk of region-specific disruptions.

The Company currently operates primarily in Hawaii and the New York (Long Island) region, and most of the Company’s revenue comes from these regions. Any disruptions to these specific states or regional areas may impact the Company’s operations and financial results.

Risks Related to the Solar Industry

If sufficient additional demand for residential solar energy systems does not develop or takes longer to develop than the Company anticipates, its ability to originate solar installation agreements may decrease.

The distributed residential solar energy market is at a relatively early stage of development in comparison to fossil fuel-based electricity generation. If additional demand for distributed residential solar energy systems fails to develop sufficiently or takes longer to develop than the Company anticipates, it may negatively impact the Company’s business.

Many factors may affect the demand for solar energy systems, including, but not limited to, the following:

availability, substance and magnitude of solar support programs, including government targets;

subsidies, incentives, renewable portfolio standards and residential net metering rules;

the relative pricing of other conventional and non-renewable energy sources, such as natural gas, coal, oil and other fossil fuels, wind, utility-scale solar, nuclear, geothermal and biomass;

performance, reliability and availability of energy generated by solar energy systems compared to conventional and other non-solar renewable energy sources;

availability and performance of energy storage technology, the ability to implement this technology for use in conjunction with solar energy systems and the cost competitiveness this technology provides to customers as compared to costs for those customers that rely solely on the conventional electrical grid; and

general economic conditions, supply chain conditions and the level of interest rates.

The residential solar energy industry is constantly evolving, which makes it difficult to evaluate the Company’s prospects. The Company cannot be certain if historical growth rates reflect future opportunities or whether it will achieve the growth it anticipates. The failure of distributed residential solar energy to achieve, or its being significantly delayed in achieving, widespread adoption could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s business prospects are dependent in part on a continuing decline in the cost of solar energy system components and the Company’s business may be adversely affected to the extent the cost of these components stabilize or increase in the future.

The market for residential solar energy systems has benefitted from the declining cost of solar energy system components and to the extent these costs stabilize, decline at a slower rate or increase, the Company’s future growth rate may be negatively affected. The declining cost of solar energy system components and the raw materials necessary to manufacture them has been a key driver in the price of solar energy systems, the prices charged for electricity and customer adoption of solar energy. Solar energy system

component and raw material prices may not continue to decline at the same rate as they have over the past several years or at all. In addition, growth in the solar industry and the resulting increase in demand for solar energy system components and the raw materials necessary to manufacture them may also put upward pressure on prices. An increase of solar energy system components and raw materials prices could slow the Company’s growth and cause its business and results of operations to suffer. Further, the cost of solar energy system components and raw materials has increased and could increase in the future due to tariff penalties, duties, the loss of or changes in economic governmental incentives or other factors.

The Company faces competition from centralized electric utilities, retail electric providers, independent power producers and renewable energy companies.

The solar energy and renewable energy industries are both highly competitive and continually evolving as participants strive to distinguish themselves within their markets and compete with large centralized electric utilities. The Company competes with these centralized electric utilities primarily based on price (cents per kWh). The Company may also compete based on other value-added benefits, such as reliability and carbon-friendly power. If the Company cannot offer compelling value to its customers based on these factors, its business may not grow.

Centralized electric utilities generally have substantially greater financial, technical, operational and other resources than the Company does. As a result, these competitors may be able to devote more resources to the promotion and sale of their products or services or respond more quickly to evolving industry standards and changes in market conditions than the Company can.

The Company also competes with retail electric providers and independent power producers that are not regulated like centralized electric utilities but that have access to the centralized utilities’ electricity transmission and distribution infrastructure pursuant to state, territorial and local pro-competition and consumer choice policies. These retail electric providers and independent power producers are able to offer customers electricity supply-only solutions that are competitive with the Company’s installation options on both price and usage of renewable energy technology while avoiding the physical installations that the Company’s business model requires. This may limit the Company’s ability to acquire new customers, particularly those who have an objection to putting solar panels on their roofs.

The Company also competes with solar companies with business models similar to its own, that market to similar potential customers. Some of these competitors specialize in the distributed residential solar energy market. Some of the Company’s competitors offer or may offer similar offerings and products as the Company. Many of the Company’s competitors also have significant brand name recognition and have extensive knowledge of its target markets.

The Company also competes with solar companies that offer community solar products and utility companies that provide renewable power purchase programs. Some customers might choose to subscribe to a community solar project or renewable subscriber programs instead of installing a solar energy system on their home, which could affect the Company’s sales. Additionally, some utility companies (and some utility-like entities, such as community choice aggregators in California) have generation portfolios that are increasingly renewable in nature. In California, for example, due to recent legislation, utility companies and community choice aggregators in that state are required to have generation portfolios comprised of 60% renewable energy by 2030 and state regulators are planning for utility companies and community choice aggregators to sell 100% greenhouse gas free electricity to retail customers by 2045. As utility companies offer increasingly renewable portfolios to retail customers, those customers might be less inclined to install a solar energy system at their home, which could adversely affect the Company’s growth.

The Company competes with companies that sell solar energy systems and services in the commercial, industrial and government markets, in addition to the residential market, in the U.S. and foreign markets. There is intense competition in the residential solar energy sector in the markets in which the Company operates. As new entrants continue to enter into these markets, the Company may be unable to grow or maintain its operations and it may be unable to compete with companies that earn revenue in both the residential market and non-residential markets. Further, because the Company provides services primarily to residential customers, the Company has a less diverse market presence and is more exposed to potential adverse changes in the residential market than its competitors that sell solar energy systems and services in the commercial, industrial, government and utility markets.

As the solar industry grows and evolves, the Company will also face new competitors and technologies who are not currently in the market. The Company’s industry is characterized by low technological barriers to entry and well-capitalized companies, including utilities and integrated energy companies, could choose to enter the market and compete with us. The Company’s failure to adapt to changing market conditions and to compete successfully with existing or new competitors will limit its growth and will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Developments in technology or improvements in distributed solar energy generation and related technologies or components may have a material adverse effect on demand for the Company’s offerings.

Significant developments in technology, such as advances in distributed solar power generation, energy storage solutions such as batteries, energy storage management systems, the widespread use or adoption of fuel cells for residential or commercial properties or

improvements in other forms of distributed or centralized power production may materially and adversely affect demand for the Company’s offerings and otherwise affect its business. Future technological advancements may result in reduced prices to consumers or more efficient solar energy systems than those available today, either of which may result in current customer dissatisfaction. The Company may not be able to adopt these new technologies as quickly as its competitors or on a cost-effective basis.

A material reduction in the retail price of electricity charged by electric utilities or other retail electricity providers could harm the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Decreases in the retail price of electricity from electric utilities or from other retail electric providers, including other renewable energy sources such as larger-scale solar energy systems, could make the Company’s offerings less economically attractive. The price of electricity from utilities could decrease for any one or more reasons, including but not limited to:

the construction of a significant number of new power generation plants, whether generated by natural gas, nuclear power, coal or renewable energy;

the construction of additional electric transmission and distribution lines;

 a reduction in the price of natural gas or other natural resources as a result of increased supply due to new drilling techniques or other technological developments;

 a relaxation of associated regulatory standards or broader economic or policy developments;

less demand for electricity due to energy conservation technologies and public initiatives to reduce electricity consumption or to recessionary economic conditions; and

development of competing energy technologies that provide less expensive energy.
‎

A reduction in electric utilities’ rates or changes to peak hour pricing policies or rate design (such as the adoption of a fixed or flat rate or adding fees to homeowners that have residential solar systems) could also make the Company’s offerings less competitive with the price of electricity from the electrical grid. If the cost of energy available from electric utilities or other providers were to decrease relative to solar energy generated from residential solar energy systems or if similar events affecting the economics of the Company’s offerings were to occur, it may have difficulty attracting new customers or existing customers may default or seek to terminate, cancel or otherwise avoid the obligations under their solar installation agreements. For example, large utilities in California have started transitioning customers to time-of-use rates and also have adopted a shift in the peak period for time-of-use rates to later in the day. Unless grandfathered under a different rate, residential customers with solar energy systems may be required to take service under time-of-use rates with the later peak period. Moving utility customers to time-of-use rates or the shift in the timing of peak rates for utility-generated electricity to include times of day when solar energy generation is less efficient or non-operable could also make the Company’s offerings less competitive. Time-of-use rates could also result in higher costs for the owners of solar energy systems whose electricity requirements are not fully met during peak periods.

Terrorist or cyberattacks against centralized utilities could adversely affect the Company’s business.

Assets owned by utilities such as substations and related infrastructure have been physically attacked in the past and will likely be attacked in the future. These facilities are often protected by limited security measures, such as perimeter fencing. Any such attacks may result in interruption to electricity flowing on the grid. Furthermore, cyberattacks, whether by individuals or nation states, against utility companies could severely disrupt their business operations and result in loss of service to customers, which would adversely affect the Company’s operations. For example, the May 2021 ransomware attack on the owners of the Colonial Pipeline system forced a shutdown of its operations for multiple days, requiring significant capital outlays and concerns by customers and regulators of the reliability of the electricity provision. In the event the Company was plagued by similar cyberattacks, customers could choose other sources for electricity, which would adversely affect the Company’s operations. Increased cyberattacks generally may also materially increase the Company’s defense costs, which would adversely affect its profitability.

Climate change may have long-term impacts on the Company’s business, industry, and the global economy.

Climate change poses a systematic threat to the global economy. While the Company’s core business model seeks to mitigate climate change by accelerating the transition to renewable energy, there are also inherent climate-related risks to the Company’s business operations. For example, climate change is likely to increase the frequency and severity of weather events; climate change may make it more challenging to predict weather outcomes, impacting operational schedules; and climate change could lead to extreme events which disrupt relevant energy infrastructure assets such as transmission grids. These types of risks could harm the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Regulations

Increases in the cost of the Company’s solar energy systems due to tariffs imposed by the U.S. government could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

China is a major producer of solar cells and other solar products. Certain solar cells, modules, laminates and panels from China are subject to various U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty rates, depending on the exporter supplying the product, imposed by the U.S. government as a result of determinations that the U.S. was materially injured as a result of such imports being sold at less than fair value and subsidized by the Chinese government. If alternative sources are not available on competitive terms in the future, the Company may seek to purchase these products from manufacturers in China. In addition, tariffs on solar cells, modules and inverters in China may put upward pressure on prices of these products in other jurisdictions from which the Company currently purchases equipment, which could reduce its ability to offer competitive pricing to potential customers.

The Company cannot predict what, if any, additional actions the U.S. may adopt with respect to tariffs or other trade regulations or what actions may be taken by other countries in retaliation for such measures. If additional measures are imposed or other negotiated outcomes occur, the Company’s ability to purchase these products on competitive terms or to access specialized technologies from other countries could be further limited, which could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is not currently regulated as an electric public utility under applicable law, but may be subject to regulation as an electric utility in the future.

The Company currently is not regulated as an electric public utility in the U.S. under applicable national, state or other local regulatory regimes where it conducts business, and is not currently subject to the various federal, state and local standards, restrictions and regulatory requirements applicable to centralized public utilities. Any federal, state or local law or regulations that cause the Company to be treated as an electric utility or to otherwise be subject to a similar regulatory regime of commission-approved operating tariffs, rate limitations and related mandatory provisions, could place significant restrictions on its ability to operate its business and execute its business plan by prohibiting, restricting or otherwise regulating its sale of electricity. If the Company were subject to the same state or federal regulatory authorities as centralized electric utilities in the U.S. and its territories or if new regulatory bodies were established to oversee its business in the U.S. and its territories or in foreign markets it enters, its operating costs would materially increase or it might have to change its business in ways that could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Electric utility policies and regulations, including those affecting electric rates, may present regulatory and economic barriers to the purchase and use of solar energy systems that may significantly reduce demand for the Company’s solar energy systems and adversely impact its ability to originate new solar installation agreements.

Federal, state and local government regulations and policies concerning the electric utility industry, utility rates and rate structures and internal policies and regulations promulgated by electric utilities, heavily influence the market for electricity generation products and services. These regulations and policies often relate to electricity pricing. Policies and regulations that promote renewable energy and distributed energy generation have been challenged by centralized electric utilities and questioned by those in government and others arguing for less governmental spending and involvement in the energy market. To the extent these views are reflected in government policies and regulations, the changes in such policies and regulations could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, any effort to overturn federal and state laws, regulations or policies that support solar energy generation or that remove costs or other limitations on other types of energy generation that compete with solar energy projects could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business.

The Company relies on net metering and related policies to sell solar systems to its customers in most of its current markets, and changes to policies governing net metering may significantly reduce demand for electricity from residential solar energy systems and thus for the Company’s installation services.

Net metering is one of several key policies that have enabled the growth of distributed generation solar energy systems in the U.S., providing significant value to customers for electricity generated by their residential solar energy systems, but not directly consumed on-site. Net metering allows a homeowner to pay his or her local electric utility for power usage net of production from the solar energy system or other distributed generation source. Homeowners receive a credit for the energy an interconnected solar energy system generates in excess of that needed by the home to offset energy purchases from the centralized utility made at times when the solar energy system is not generating sufficient energy to meet the customer’s demand. In many markets, this credit is equal to the residential retail rate for electricity and in other markets, such as Hawaii, where the rate is less than the retail rate and may be set, for example, as a percentage of the retail rate or based upon a valuation of the excess electricity. In some states and utility territories, customers are also reimbursed by the centralized electric utility for net excess generation on a periodic basis.

Net metering programs have been subject to legislative and regulatory scrutiny in certain states and territories. These jurisdictions, by statute, regulation, administrative order or a combination thereof, have recently adopted or are considering new restrictions and

additional changes to net metering programs either on a state-wide basis or within specific utility territories. Many of these measures were introduced and supported by centralized electric utilities. These measures vary by jurisdiction and may include a reduction in the rates or value of the credits customers are paid or receive for the power they deliver back to the electrical grid, caps or limits on the aggregate installed capacity of generation in a state or utility territory eligible for net metering, expiration dates for and phasing out of net metering programs, replacement of net metering programs with alternative programs that may provide less compensation and limits on the capacity size of individual distributed generation systems that can qualify for net metering. Net metering and related policies concerning distributed generation also received attention from federal legislators and regulators.

If net metering caps in certain jurisdictions are met, if the value of the credit that customers receive for net metering is significantly reduced, if net metering is discontinued or replaced by a different regime that values solar energy at a lower rate or if other limits or restrictions on net metering are imposed, the Company’s current and future customers may be unable to recognize the same level of cost savings associated with net metering. The absence of favorable net metering policies or of net metering entirely, or the imposition of new charges that only or disproportionately impact customers that use net metering would likely significantly limit customer demand for distributed residential solar energy systems and thus for the Company’s installation services.

A customer’s decision to procure installation services from the Company depends in part on the availability of rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives. The expiration, elimination or reduction of these rebates, credits or incentives or its ability to monetize them could adversely impact its business.

The Company’s business depends in part on current government policies that promote and support solar energy and enhance the economic viability of distributed residential solar. U.S. federal, state and local governments established various incentives and financial mechanisms to reduce the cost of solar energy and to accelerate the adoption of solar energy. These incentives come in various forms, including rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives such as payments for renewable energy credits associated with renewable energy generation, exclusion of solar energy systems from property tax assessments or other taxes and system performance payments. However, these programs may expire on a particular date, end when the allocated funding is exhausted or be reduced or terminated as solar energy adoption rates increase.

A loss or reduction in such incentives could decrease the attractiveness of new solar energy systems to customers, which could adversely impact the Company’s business.

Applicable authorities may adjust or decrease incentives from time to time or include provisions for minimum domestic content requirements or other requirements to qualify for these incentives. Reductions in, eliminations or expirations of or additional application requirements for governmental incentives could adversely impact results of operations and ability to compete in the Company’s industry by increasing the cost of solar energy systems.

Technical and regulatory limitations regarding the interconnection of solar energy systems to the electrical grid may significantly delay interconnections and customer in-service dates, harming the Company’s growth rate and customer satisfaction.

Technical and regulatory limitations regarding the interconnection of solar energy systems to the electrical grid may curb or slow the Company’s growth in key markets. Utilities throughout the country follow different rules and regulations regarding interconnection and regulators or utilities have or could cap or limit the amount of solar energy that can be interconnected to the grid. The Company’s solar energy systems generally do not provide power to homeowners until they are interconnected to the grid.

With regard to interconnection limits, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, (“FERC”), in promulgating the first form of small generator interconnection procedures, recommended limiting customer-sited intermittent generation resources, such as the Company’s solar energy systems, to a certain percentage of peak load on a given electrical feeder circuit. Similar limits have been adopted by many states as a de facto standard and could constrain the Company’s ability to market to customers in certain geographic areas where the concentration of solar installations exceeds this limit.

Furthermore, in certain areas, the Company benefits from policies that allow for expedited or simplified procedures related to connecting solar energy systems to the electrical grid. The Company also is required to obtain interconnection permission for each solar energy system from the local utility. In many states and territories, by statute, regulations or administrative order, there are standardized procedures for interconnecting distributed residential solar energy systems to the electric utility’s local distribution system. However, approval from the local utility could be delayed as a result of a backlog of requests for interconnection or the local utility could seek to limit the number of customer interconnections or the amount of solar energy on the grid. In some states, certain utilities such as municipal utilities or electric cooperatives are exempt from certain interconnection requirements. If expedited or simplified interconnection procedures are changed or cease to be available, if interconnection approvals from the local utility are delayed or if the local utility seeks to limit interconnections, this could decrease the attractiveness of new solar energy systems to distributed residential solar power companies, including the Company, and the attractiveness of solar energy systems to customers. Delays in interconnections could also harm the Company’s growth rate and customer satisfaction scores.

As adoption of solar distributed generation rises, along with the increased operation of utility-scale solar generation (such as in key markets including California), the amount of solar energy being contributed to the electrical grid may surpass the capacity anticipated to be needed to meet aggregate demand. Some centralized public utilities claim in less than five years, solar generation resources may reach a level capable of producing an over-generation situation, which may require some existing solar generation resources to be curtailed to maintain operation of the electrical grid. In the event such an over-generation situation were to occur, it could also result in a prohibition on the addition of new solar generation resources. The adverse effects of such a curtailment or prohibition without compensation could adversely impact the Company’s business, results of operations, and future growth.

Compliance with occupational safety and health requirements and best practices can be costly, and noncompliance with such requirements may result in potentially significant monetary penalties, operational delays and adverse publicity.

The installation of solar energy systems requires individuals hired by the Company or third-party contractors, potentially including the Company’s employees, to work at heights with complicated and potentially dangerous electrical systems. The evaluation and modification of buildings as part of the installation process requires these individuals to work in locations that may contain potentially dangerous levels of asbestos, lead, mold or other materials known or believed to be hazardous to human health. There is substantial risk of serious injury or death if proper safety procedures are not followed. The Company’s operations are subject to regulation under OSHA, DOT regulations and equivalent state and local laws. Changes to OSHA or DOT requirements, or stricter interpretation or enforcement of existing laws or regulations, could result in increased costs. If the Company fails to comply with applicable OSHA or DOT regulations, even if no work-related serious injury or death occurs, it may be subject to civil or criminal enforcement and be required to pay substantial penalties, incur significant capital expenditures or suspend or limit operations. Individuals hired by or on behalf of the Company may have workplace accidents and receive citations from OSHA regulators for alleged safety violations, resulting in fines. Any such accidents, citations, violations, injuries or failure to comply with industry best practices may subject the Company to adverse publicity, damage its reputation and competitive position and adversely affect its business.

Our business is subject to consumer protection laws. Such laws and regulatory enforcement policies and priorities are subject to change, which may negatively impact our business. 

We must comply with various international, federal, state, and local regulatory regimes, including those applicable to consumer credit transactions, leases, and marketing activities. These laws and regulations are subject to change and modification by statute, administrative rules and orders, and judicial interpretation. As a result of infrequent or sparse interpretations, ambiguities in these laws and regulations may create uncertainty with respect to what type of conduct is permitted or restricted under such laws and regulations. Regulators, such as the Federal Trade Commission and the Consumer Financial Protection Board, as well as state attorney generals and agencies, also can initiate inquiries into market participants, which can lead to investigations and, ultimately, enforcement actions. As a result, we are subject to a constantly evolving consumer protection and consumer finance regulatory environment that is difficult to predict and may affect our business.

The laws to which we may be subject to include federal and state laws that prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive business acts or practices (such as the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Dodd-Frank Act), regulate lease and loan disclosures and terms and conditions (such as the Truth-in-Lending Act and the Consumer Leasing Act), and provide additional protections for certain customers in the military (such as the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act). Our business is or may also be subject to federal and state laws that regulate consumer credit report information, data privacy, debt collection, electronic fund transfers, service contracts, home improvement contracting and marketing activities (such as telemarketing, door-to-door sales, and e-mails).

While we have developed policies and procedures designed to assist in compliance with these laws and regulations, no assurance is given that our compliance policies and procedures will be effective. Failure to comply with these laws and with regulatory requirements applicable to our business could subject us to damages, revocation of licenses, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions, civil and criminal liability, settlements, limits on offering certain products and services, changes in business practices, increased compliance costs, indemnification obligations to our capital providers, loan repurchase obligations and reputational damage that may harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY

The Company has an information security program designed to identify, mitigate, respond to and manage reasonably foreseeable cybersecurity risks and threats. The program is overseen by the Chief Financial Officer. The CFO in conjunction with senior management conducts periodic reviews of cybersecurity control, policies, and procedures to ensure relevance and effectiveness for the Company’s needs and operating environment. The CFO has previously led IT/cyber strategy and programs in his past work experiences and is able to apply those experiences to the Company. The audit and finance committee of the board has discussions with

management on an annual basis about the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies, particularly in the areas of financial reporting, internal controls, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

One aspect of the Company’s information security program is focused on vendor selection. The Company evaluates all third-party vendors and service providers for their cybersecurity features and compliance with security requirements. Selected vendors, for example, must employ a variety of security measures to protect against unauthorized access, data breaches, and data loss. Pineapple Energy remains committed to maintaining the highest standards of data security and ensuring the integrity and confidentiality of our data.

Our business strategy, results of operations and financial condition have not been materially affected by risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of previously identified cybersecurity incidents, but we cannot provide assurance that they will not be materially affected in the future by such risks or any future material incidents. For more information on our cybersecurity related risks, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The following is a summary of the Company’s leased property:

The Company leases 8,590 square feet of office space in Minnetonka, Minnesota, where its executive and administrative offices are located. JDL Technologies and Ecessa use this facility for some administrative operations.

The Company leases 10,000 square feet of office and warehouse space in Aiea, Hawaii.

SUNation leases 59,000 square feet of office and warehouse space in Ronkonkoma, New York and 3,000 square feet of office and warehouse space in Tampa, FL.

The Company believes these facilities will be adequate to accommodate its needs for the foreseeable future.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is subject to claims and lawsuits that have been filed in the ordinary course of business. From time to time, the Company brings suit against others to enforce contract rights or property rights, or to collect debts in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the resolution or settlement of any pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or liquidity of the Company.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER

MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

The Company’s common stock trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the trading symbol PEGY.

Holders

At March 15, 2024, there were approximately 272 registered holders of record of Pineapple Energy Inc. common stock.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table presents information about the Company’s equity compensation plans, under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance, as of December 31, 2023:

Equity Compensation Plan Information

(1)Includes outstanding awards under the 2022 Equity Incentive Plan, as well as restricted stock units outstanding under inducement grants made to the Company’s newly-hired Chief Financial Officer in October 2022 and to newly-hired employees in connection with the SUNation acquisition in November 2022, in each case in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c)(4).

(2)Only restricted stock units are outstanding, which do not have an exercise price; they are settled in shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis at no additional cost.

(3)Includes the Pineapple Energy Inc. 2022 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”) and the Pineapple Energy Inc. 2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). The Equity Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, stock unit awards and other stock-based awards to employees, non-employee directors and consultants and advisors to the Company. The number of shares of Company common stock available for issuance under the Equity Plan initially was 750,000 and was increased to 1,250,000 by shareholder approval on December 7, 2022. The ESPP was approved by shareholders on December 7, 2022, and provides for the purchase by eligible employees of shares of the Company’s common stock at a discount to the market price. The number of shares authorized for issuance under the ESPP was initially 200,000 and was increased to 500,000 by shareholder approval on December 14, 2023.

ITEM 6.    [RESERVED]

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this report.

Overview

Pineapple Energy Inc. (formerly Communications Systems, Inc. (“CSI”) and Pineapple Holdings, Inc.) (herein referred to as “Pineapple,” “PEGY,” “our,” “we” or the “Company”) was originally organized as a Minnesota corporation in 1969. On March 28, 2022, the Company completed its previously announced merger transaction with Pineapple Energy LLC (“Pineapple Energy”) in accordance with the terms of a merger agreement, pursuant to which a subsidiary of the Company merged with and into Pineapple Energy, with Pineapple Energy surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “merger”). Following the closing of the merger (the “Closing”) the Company changed its name from Communications Systems, Inc. to Pineapple Holdings, Inc. and subsequently, on April 13, 2022, changed its name to Pineapple Energy Inc.

In addition, on March 28, 2022 and immediately prior to the Closing, the Company completed its acquisition (“HEC Asset Acquisition”) of substantially all of the assets of two Hawaii-based solar energy companies, Hawaii Energy Connection, LLC (“HEC”) and E-Gear, LLC (“E-Gear”). On November 9, 2022, the Company purchased the equity of New York-based SUNation Solar Systems, Inc. and five of its affiliated entities (collectively “SUNation”).

Pineapple’s vision is to power the energy transition through grass-roots growth of solar electricity paired with battery storage. The Company is a growing domestic operator and consolidator of residential and commercial solar, battery storage, and grid services solutions. Our strategy is focused on acquiring, integrating, and growing leading local and regional solar, storage, and energy services companies nationwide.  

Pineapple is primarily engaged in the sale, design, and installation of photovoltaic solar energy systems and battery storage systems through its Hawaii-based HEC and New York-based SUNation entities. We install systems that provide clean, reliable solar energy typically at savings relative to traditional utility offerings. Our primary customers are residential homeowners. We also provide solar energy systems to commercial owners and other municipal customers.  

Through its E-Gear business, Pineapple also develops, manufactures, and sells patented edge-of-grid energy management software and hardware technology, such as energy management control devices. These products allow homeowners to get the most out of their installed photovoltaic solar energy systems and utility grid support benefits. Our primary customers for this technology are energy services companies and other utilities.

While CSI was the legal acquirer in the merger, because Pineapple Energy was determined to be the accounting acquirer, the historical financial statements of Pineapple Energy became the historical financial statements of the combined company upon the consummation of the merger. As a result, the financial statements included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, and the discussion in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, reflect the historical operating results of Pineapple Energy prior to the merger, the consolidated results of CSI, Pineapple Energy, HEC, and E-Gear following the Closing, including the results of SUNation following that acquisition, and the Company’s equity structure for all periods presented. Accordingly, references to “the Company” herein are to the applicable entity at the date or during the time period in the applicable discussion.

Forward Looking Statements

In this report and from time to time, in reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in press releases, and in other communications to shareholders or the investing public, we may make “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We may make these forward-looking statements concerning possible or anticipated future financial performance, business activities, plans, pending claims, investigations or litigation, which are typically preceded by the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends” or similar expressions. For these forward-looking statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in federal securities laws. Shareholders and the investing public should understand that these forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance, activities, anticipated results, outcomes or plans to differ significantly from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. For a detailed discussion of a number of these risk factors, please see Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Generally, we base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions in accordance with GAAP that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates and such differences could be material to our financial position and results of operations. Critical accounting estimates are those that involve a significant level of estimation uncertainty and have had or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report, we believe the following discussion addresses our most critical accounting estimates, which involve significant subjectivity and judgment, and changes to such estimates or assumptions could have a material impact on our financial condition or operating results. Therefore, we consider an understanding of the variability and judgment required in making these estimates and assumptions to be critical in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results.

Income Taxes: In the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, management calculates income taxes. This includes estimating the Company’s current tax liability as well as assessing temporary differences resulting from different treatment of items for tax and book accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on the balance sheet. These assets and liabilities are analyzed regularly and management assesses the likelihood it will realize these deferred assets from future taxable income. We determine the valuation allowance for deferred income tax benefits based upon the expectation of whether the benefits are more likely than not to be realized. The Company records interest and penalties related to income taxes as income tax expense in the consolidated statements loss and comprehensive loss.

Accounting for Business Combinations: We record all acquired assets and liabilities, including goodwill, other identifiable intangible assets, contingent value rights and contingent consideration at fair value. The initial recording of goodwill, other identifiable intangible assets, contingent value rights and contingent consideration, requires certain estimates and assumptions concerning the determination of the fair values and useful lives. The judgments made in the context of the purchase price allocation can materially affect our future results of operations. The valuations calculated from estimates are based on information available at the acquisition date. Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to annual tests for impairment or more frequent tests if events or circumstances indicate it may be impaired. Other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are subject to impairment if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount. The contingent consideration and contingent value rights liability are adjusted to fair value each reporting period with any adjustments recorded within the statement of operations. For additional details, see Note 3, Business Combinations and Note 10, Goodwill and Intangible Assets.

Goodwill: Goodwill is recorded as the difference, if any, between the aggregate consideration paid for an acquisition and the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from acquisitions. We test goodwill for impairment annually on October 1 or more frequently if events and circumstances warrant. Such events and circumstances may be a significant change in our business climate, economic and industry trends, legal factors, negative operating performance indicators, significant competition or changes in strategy. We perform our goodwill impairment test at the reporting unit level, which is the same as our operating segments.

An impairment charge for goodwill is recognized only when the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, including goodwill, is less than its carrying amount. In applying the goodwill impairment assessment, the Company may assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Qualitative factors may include, but are not limited to, economic, market and industry conditions, cost factors and overall financial performance of the reporting unit. If after assessing these qualitative factors, the Company determines it is "more-likely-than not" that the fair value is less than the carrying value, a quantitative assessment of goodwill is required. The quantitative impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, the assignment of assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting units, and the determination of fair value of each reporting unit. The impairment test requires the comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. We estimate the reporting units’ fair value using a combination of the income approach based upon projected discounted cash flows of the reporting unit and the market approach based upon the market multiple of comparable publicly traded companies. If the estimated fair value of the reporting entity exceeds the carrying value, the goodwill is not impaired, and no further review is required. However, if the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, an impairment expense should be recognized for the excess of the carrying value over the fair value.

Under the income approach, the estimated discounted cash flows are based on the best information available to us at the time, including supportable assumptions and projections we believe are reasonable. Our discounted cash flow estimates use discount rates that correspond to a weighted-average cost of capital consistent with a market-participant view. Certain other key assumptions utilized, including revenue and cash flow projections, are based on estimates consistent with those utilized in our annual budgeting and planning process that we believe are reasonable. However, if we do not achieve the results reflected in the assumptions and estimates, our goodwill impairment evaluations could be adversely affected, and we may impair a portion or all of our goodwill, which would adversely affect our operating results in the period of impairment.

The market approach identifies the revenue multiples of comparable publicly traded companies. The reporting unit’s revenue projections are multiplied by the market multiple to estimate its current estimated fair value. If the market multiples or revenue value assumptions are incorrect, our goodwill impairment evaluation could also be adversely affected, and we may impair a portion or all of our goodwill, which would adversely affect our operating results in the period of impairment.

No goodwill impairment was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

Convertible Preferred Stock and Warrants: In March 2022, the Company issued shares of Series A convertible preferred stock (the “Convertible Preferred Stock”) and warrants (the “PIPE Warrants”) to investors as part of a $32.0 million private investment in public equity (“PIPE”) transaction. The proceeds from the issuance of the Convertible Preferred Stock were allocated between the Convertible Preferred Stock and PIPE Warrants using a relative fair value method. The Company accounts for the Convertible Preferred Stock and PIPE Warrants based on an assessment of the specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity”, and ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”. The Convertible Preferred Stock is reported as part of permanent equity and the PIPE Warrants were determined to be equity-classified.

Results of Operations

2023 Compared to 2022

The consolidated results herein reflect the historical operating results of Pineapple Energy prior to the merger and the consolidated results of CSI (excluding the discontinued operations of JDL & Ecessa), Pineapple Energy, HEC and E-Gear following the Closing on March 28, 2022 and the results of SUNation following the closing on its acquisition on November 9, 2022.

Consolidated sales were $79,632,709 in 2023 and $27,522,099 in 2022. As Pineapple Energy had limited revenue in the first quarter of the prior year, the increase in sales was due to the merger, the HEC Asset Acquisition and the acquisition of SUNation during 2022. Sales in 2023 and 2022 by type were as follows:

Consolidated gross profit increased to $27,696,190 in 2023 as compared to gross profit of $7,377,445 in 2022 due to the increase in revenue through acquisitions. Gross margin increased to 34.8% in 2023 compared to 26.8% in 2022 due to the SUNation acquisition, normalization of the supply chain and an overall decrease in product costs.

Consolidated operating expenses, which include selling, general and administrative expenses, amortization expense, transaction costs and a fair value remeasurement loss on SUNation earnout consideration increased 97.3% to $35,163,055 in 2023 as compared to $17,826,124 in 2022. Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $29,072,558 in 2023 from $12,211,135 in 2022, due primarily to a $16,038,900 increase in selling, general and administrative costs associated with acquired businesses. Amortization expense increased by $1,605,017 to $4,738,477 in 2023 due to additional intangible assets acquired through acquired businesses. Transaction costs decreased by $2,229,509 to $2,020 in 2023, due to the consummation

of the merger and the HEC Asset Acquisition in the first quarter of 2022 and limited activity in 2023. There was also a $1,350,000 fair value remeasurement loss related to the SUNation acquisition earnout consideration in 2023.

Consolidated other income decreased $6,536,711 to $646,149 in 2023 as compared to $7,182,860 in 2022. The decrease was related to a $4,684,000 gain on the fair value remeasurement of the merger earnout consideration in 2022, a $792,767 decrease in the gain on sale of assets in 2023 compared to the same period of 2022 and a $1,680,911 increase in interest and accretion expense, partially offset by a $549,017 increase in fair value remeasurement gain on the CVRs.

Consolidated operating loss from continuing operations before income taxes in 2023 was $6,820,716, compared to a consolidated operating loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $3,265,819 in 2022. Net loss from continuing operations in 2023 was $6,939,892, or ($0.69) per diluted share. Net loss attributable to common shareholders in 2022 (after taking into effect $16,863,892 in deemed dividends) was $27,216,132, or ($2.99) per diluted share from continuing operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2023, the Company had approximately $5,396,343 in cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and liquid investments, compared to $7,923,244 at December 31, 2022. Of this amount, $1,799,357 was invested in short-term money market funds that are not considered to be bank deposits and are not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or other government agency. These money market funds seek to preserve the value of the investment at $1.00 per share; however, it is possible to lose money investing in these funds. The remainder in cash and cash equivalents is operating cash. The Company also had $0 in investments consisting of corporate notes and bonds that are traded on the open market and are classified as available-for-sale at December 31, 2023.

Of the amounts of cash, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents on the balance sheet at December 31, 2023, $1,821,060 consist of funds that can only be used to support the legacy CSI business, will be distributed to CVR holders and cannot be used to support the working capital needs of the Pineapple Energy business.

The Company had working capital of $(6,594,834), consisting of current assets of approximately $15,778,648 and current liabilities of $22,373,482 at December 31, 2023 compared to working capital of $27,366, consisting of current assets of $25,961,524 and current liabilities of $25,934,158 at the end of 2022.

Cash flow used in operating activities was approximately $667,177 in 2023 compared to $7,577,199 used in 2022. Significant working capital changes from 2022 to 2023 included a decrease in other accrued liabilities of $4,494,247, a decrease in other assets of $3,333,146, a decrease in inventory of $2,475,825, and a decrease in customer deposits of $2,172,766. $1,584,541 of the decrease in other assets and $2,181,761 of the decrease in other accrued liabilities was related to the receipt and payment out of the employee retention credit receivable and other related party payables. Other accrued liabilities also decreased by approximately $2.3 million due to a decrease in billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings as commercial projects were completed during the year.

Cash provided by investing activities was $3,567,278 in 2023 compared to $3,097,406 provided in 2022. Net cash provided in 2023 was the result of proceeds from the sale of investments and proceeds from the sale of the JDL and Ecessa assets included within discontinued operations, partially offset by capital expenditures. Net cash used in 2022 was primarily related to $10,991,128 in net cash paid for the HEC Asset Acquisition, the merger, and the SUNation acquisition partially offset by $6,297,865 in proceeds from the sale of assets previously classified as held for sale and $1,500,000 in earnout consideration payments related to legacy CSI’s sale of its Electronics and Software segment in 2021.

Net cash used in financing activities was $2,760,236 in 2023 compared to $15,912,117 in 2022. Net cash used in financing activities in 2023 was due to $3,036,676 in CVR distributions and $5,000,000 in payments against the SUNation Short-Term Note and $1,500,000 in payments against the Hercules Capital, Inc. (“Hercules”) term loan, as discussed further in Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, partially offset by $7,500,000 in borrowings from Decathlon Specialty Finance, LLC (“Decathlon”). In 2022, the Company received $32,000,000 in proceeds from the issuance of convertible preferred stock and warrants to PIPE Investors and paid $2,699,370 in related issuance costs. The Company also paid $8,745,628 in CVR distributions and $4,500,000 in principal against the Hercules term loan in 2022, as discussed further in Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies.

In connection with the SUNation Acquisition, on November 9, 2022, the Company issued a $5,000,000 Short-Term Limited Recourse Secured Promissory Note (the “Short-Term Note”) and a $5,486,000 Long-Term Promissory Note (the “Long-Term Note”). The Short-Term Note was secured as described below and was scheduled to mature on August 9, 2023. It carried an annual interest rate of 4% until the three-month anniversary of issuance, 8% thereafter until the six-month anniversary of issuance, then 12% thereafter until the Short-Term Note is paid in full. The Short-Term Note was paid in full in conjunction

with the Decathlon loan. The Long-Term Note is unsecured and matures on November 9, 2025. It carries an annual interest rate of 4% until the first anniversary of issuance, then 8% thereafter until the Long-Term Note is paid in full. The Company will be required to make a principal payment of $2.74 million on the second anniversary of the Long-Term Note. The Long-Term Note may be prepaid at our option at any time without penalty.

As discussed above and in Note 3, Business Combinations and Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, on November 9, 2022, the Company, in connection with the SUNation acquisition, paid $2.39 million in cash and entered into the Short-Term Note and the Long-Term Note.

Based on the Company’s current financial position, the Company’s forecasted future cash flows for twelve months beyond the date of issuance of the financial statements in this report indicate that the Company will not have sufficient cash to make the first SUNation earnout payment in the second quarter of 2024 or the first principal payment of the Long-Term Note due on November 9, 2024, factors which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

As a result, the Company requires additional funding and seeks to raise capital through sources that may include public or private equity offerings, debt financings and/or strategic alliances. However, additional funding may not be available on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all. If the Company is unable to raise additional funds, it would have a negative impact on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. To the extent that additional funds are raised through the sale of equity or securities convertible into or exercisable for equity securities, the issuance of securities will result in dilution to the Company’s shareholders. Further, certain transactions could trigger an adjustment to the exercise price of the Convertible Preferred Stock and PIPE Warrants, which would lead to a corresponding increase in the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the PIPE Warrants, further diluting the Company’s shareholders.

Contingent Value Rights and Impact on Cash

As discussed in Note 3, Business Combinations, the Company issued CVRs prior to the closing of the merger to CSI shareholders of record on the close of business on March 25, 2022. The CVR entitles the holder to a portion of the cash, cash equivalents, investments and net proceeds of any divestiture, assignment, or other disposition of all legacy assets of CSI and/or its legacy subsidiaries, JDL and Ecessa, that are related to CSI’s pre-merger business, assets, and properties that occur during the period following the closing of the merger and ending initially on March 28, 2024, but was extended through December 31, 2024 by the First Amendment to the Contingent Value Rights Agreement entered into on March 27, 2024. The CVR liability as of December 31, 2023 was estimated at $1,691,072 and represented the estimated fair value as of that date of the legacy CSI assets to be distributed to CVR holders as of that date. This amount is recorded as a long-term liability that includes the remaining restricted cash and cash equivalents, investments, along with the other tangible and intangible assets related to the legacy CSI business. The proceeds from CSI’s pre-merger business working capital and related long term-assets and liabilities are not available to fund the working capital needs of the post-merger company.

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report for a discussion of new accounting standards.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company has no freestanding or embedded derivatives. The Company’s policy is to not use freestanding derivatives and to not enter into contracts with terms that cannot be designated as normal purchases or sales.

The Company’s investments are in money markets that earn interest at prevailing market rates and as such do not have material risk exposure.

Based on the Company’s operations, in the opinion of management, the Company is not exposed to material future losses due to market risk.

‎

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

‎

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT

The management of Pineapple Energy Inc. and its subsidiary companies is responsible for the integrity and objectivity of the financial statements and other financial information contained in the annual report. The financial statements and related information were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include amounts that are based on management’s informed judgments and estimates.

In fulfilling its responsibilities for the integrity of financial information, management maintains accounting systems and related controls. These controls provide reasonable assurance, at appropriate costs, that assets are safeguarded against losses and that financial records are reliable for use in preparing financial statements. Management recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs according to the highest standards of personal and corporate conduct.

The Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors, comprised solely of independent, non-employee directors, meets with the independent auditors and management periodically to review accounting, auditing, financial reporting and internal control matters. The independent auditors have free access to this committee, without management present, to discuss the results of their audit work and their opinion on the adequacy of internal financial controls and the quality of financial reporting.

‎

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
‎Shareholders of Pineapple Energy Inc.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Pineapple Energy Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2023, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Substantial Doubt About the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s current financial position and the Company’s forecasted future cash flows for twelve months beyond the date of issuance of these financial statements indicate that the Company will not have sufficient cash to make the first SUNation earnout payment in the second quarter of 2024 or the first principal payment of the Long-Term Note due on November 9, 2024, factors which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 17. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Critical Audit Matter - Goodwill Impairment

At December 31, 2023, the carrying value of the Company’s goodwill was $20,545,850, of which $9,829,212 and $10,716,638 were allocated to the HEC and SUNation reporting units, respectively. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, annually on October 1 or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred. Management determined that a quantitative goodwill impairment analysis was required as of December 31, 2023. The impairment test was performed by calculating the fair value of the Company’s reporting units, using a combination of an income approach and market approach. Management engaged a third-party valuation specialist to assist with the analysis. During the year ended December 31, 2023 no impairment was recorded.

Auditing management’s goodwill impairment test was complex and judgmental, due to the significant estimation required to determine the present value of each reporting unit’s future discounted cash flows. The discounted cash flows were sensitive to

the projected revenue growth rates, EBITDA margins, terminal growth rates and the discount rates applied. These significant assumptions are affected by expectations about future market and economic conditions. There was also judgment in selecting the comparable publicly traded companies used by the Company to determine the revenue multiples under the market approach.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in Our Audit

Our audit procedures performed to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s estimates and assumptions included assessing the methodologies used by the Company and testing the significant assumptions used in the quantitative models. To test the fair value of the Company’s reporting units, we performed audit procedures that included the following:

Compared the projected revenue growth rates to the Company’s historical results and industry and economic data, and compared projected EBITDA margins to historical results and industry data. We assessed the historical accuracy of management’s prior forecasts to actual results to evaluate management’s ability to accurately forecast future revenues and gross profit.

Involved our valuation specialists to 1) assess management’s fair value methodology, compare the terminal growth rates to external industry and economic data, and to determine an independent estimate of the discount rates and 2) evaluate the comparable public companies utilized by management under the market approach.

Evaluated certain inputs and assumptions for consistency where they were used by management in other accounting estimates impacting the consolidated financial statements.

Tested management’s fair value calculations for clerical accuracy.

Performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the fair value of the reporting units that would result from changes in these assumptions.

Assessed the appropriateness of the disclosures in the financial statements.

‎

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the board of directors of Pineapple Energy Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
‎
‎We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Pineapple Energy Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively, referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
‎
‎Substantial Doubt About the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered losses and negative cash flows from operations and has negative working capital due to a note payable which matures in August 2023 that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 17. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
‎
‎Basis for Opinion
‎

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We served as the Company’s auditor from 2021 to 2023.

/s/ Baker Tilly US, LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

April 14, 2023

‎

‎